Oct 19 2009
Low Carb Report, Complete with Graph
It’s about as scientific as a sample of 1 can get in three weeks, but here are the results so far of my low carb experiment.
Bottom line: I have way exceeded my allotment of Weight Watchers points, but I have not gained weight.

Here’s how to read the graph:
- It is really 2 graphs. Green and Yellow are Weight Watchers Points per day (numbers on axis on the left). Yellow is where Weight Watchers wants me to be: 20 points per day. Green is what I ate.
- Blue is my weight (numbers on the axis on the right).
In this brief time frame, there is a correlation between points and weight–note that my weight spikes a few days after my points spike. But with an allocation of 25 points per day (20 daily plus 35 weekly), Weight Watchers expects me to gain steadily as I consume more than that most days.
What does it mean? Here’s what I think. All these are hunches so far.
- Sugar sensitivity impacts my success in weight loss, and in Weight Watchers specifically, because the types of points I consume matter–that is, a high carb point “counts more” than a low carb point for me.
- Carbs affect me more than they affect most people. Otherwise, all of Weight Watchers’s science would be consistent with my experience.
- I hear friends say, “Weight Watchers doesn’t work for me–I stay within my points and still gain weight.” Maybe these people are sensitive to carbs like I am.
I’m not out to prove Weight Watchers is wrong or bad. I adore WW. But WW alone doesn’t help me control carbs–in fact their products wreak havoc on my appetite and make me crave carbs. And I’m curious to know whether all points are created equal. For me, I suspect not.
I’m going to keep charting (although my food journaling is admittedly less than perfect–there will be gaps in the numbers).